Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat are two of the industry’s most famous trail running shoes. Both shoes are popular for their remarkable padding, comfort, and longevity. However, there are several dissimilarities between the two shoes that athletes should consider before hitting the jackpot.
One of the key differences between the Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat is the weight. The Torrent is moderately more delicate than the Speedgoat, which may be a necessary factor for players who prefer speed and agility. Furthermore, the Speedgoat contains a 1mm lower drop than the Torrent, which may feature a more innate feel for runners prioritizing a deeper profile shoe.
Another dissimilarity between the two shoes is the standard of reactiveness. The Torrent is considered more reactive than the Speedgoat, which may be advantageous for runners who desire a shoe that can rapidly adapt to changes in terrain or pace. Conversely, the Speedgoat is famous for its outstanding traction and steadiness, which may be obligatory for runners who withstand steep or technical trails.
Comparison Table: Hoka Torrent Vs Hoka Speed
| Feature | Hoka Torrent | Hoka Speedgoat |
| Weight | Lightweight | Heavier |
| Cushioning | Less cushioning | More cushioning |
| Fit | Relaxed fit | Snugger fit in midfoot |
| Traction | Aggressive lug pattern | Less aggressive lug pattern |
| Stability | Less stable | More stable |
| Upper | Breathable | More durable |
| Outsole | Thinner outsole | Thicker outsole |
| Stack Height & Heel Drop | Lower stack height, higher drop | Higher stack height, lower drop |
| Price | Generally more economical | Typically more expensive |
Overview of Hoka Torrent
Hoka Torrent is a deep-profile, nimble trail racer with padding and agility. It is a delicate performance shoe with a lenient landing and reactive toe-off. The Torrent is structured to offer a snug and sturdy ride on technical terrain.
The Hoka Torrent is a versatile shoe that can be worn for activities such as trail running, hiking, and backpacking. It offers a PROFLY™ midsole that features a balance of padding and propulsion. The Torrent also contains a multidirectional lugged outsole with excellent grip on diverse surfaces.
One of the noteworthy attributes of the Hoka Torrent is its feathery construction. The shoe weighs approximately 9.3oz, making it one of the most delicate trail shoes in the industry. It comprises a 5mm drop, moderately more significant than other Hoka models.
The Torrent has an absorbent mesh upper that gives a snug and safe fit. It also has a shielding toe cap that aids in protecting the feet from rocks and other problems on the trail. The shoe is obtainable in both men’s and women’s sizes.
Overall, the Hoka Torrent is perfect for those searching for a delicate and classic trail shoe. It provides a snug and sturdy ride on technical terrain, and its multi-purpose lugged outsole gives remarkable grip.
Overview of Hoka Speedgoat
Hoka Speedgoat is a famous trail running shoe that has become beloved among elite ultra runners because of its extraordinary padding. The shoe is named after Karl “Speedgoat” Meltzer, a heroic ultra runner who has aced more 100-mile trail races than anyone in history.
The Hoka Speedgoat provides a broad platform that gives steadiness on uneven terrain and a Vibram Megagrip outsole that features remarkable traction on both damp and dry surfaces. The shoe also contains a feathery and porous upper structure to keep the foot cool, fresh and dry during long runs.
One of the significant attributes of the Hoka Speedgoat is its padding system. The shoe contains a whole-length EVA midsole that gives adequate padding and aid and a Meta-Rocker geometry that encourages an even and efficient stride. The shoe also includes a 4mm heel-to-toe drop, which aids in promoting a natural foot strike.
The Hoka Speedgoat is accessible in both men’s and women’s sizes and is obtainable in various colors. The shoe comprises a medium standard of arch support and is adaptable for athletes with neutral to moderate pronation. The Hoka Speedgoat is a top-quality trail running shoe with outstanding padding, steadiness, and traction.
Comparing Design and Construction
Concerning pattern and construction, the Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat trail running shoes contain some similarities and dissimilarities. In this part, we will contrast both boots’ insole, midsole, upper, and outsole formation.
Insole Construction
The insole of both the Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat is demountable, permitting personalization and replacement. The insole of the Torrent is designed of EVA foam, which gives padding and support.
Conversely, the Speedgoat offers an Ortholite insole, engineered to be more hard-wearing and porous than customary foam insoles.
Midsole Construction
The midsole of both shoes provides Hoka’s signature padding technology, which gives an abundant and reactive ride. However, the Torrent and Speedgoat contain distinct midsole constructions.
The Torrent comprise a PROFLY midsole, which is mushier in the heel and sturdy in the forefoot for an even and rugged ride. The Speedgoat, on the other side, contain a CMEVA midsole, which gives a more consistent padding throughout the shoe.
Upper Construction
The upper formation of both shoes is constructed to offer a safe and snug fit. The Torrent provides a feathery, absorbent netting upper with overlays for additional aid and durability.
The Speedgoat comprises a more rugged upper with 3D-printed overlays for intensified midfoot assistance and a more secure fit. Both shoes contain a gusseted tongue to keep debris out.
Outsole Construction
The outsole of both shoes is structured to offer grip and durability on various terrains. The Torrent contains multidirectional lugs with a broader spacing for finer traction and release. The Speedgoat has a Vibram Megagrip containing 5mm stepped lugs for finer grip on up and downhill terrain.
The Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat contain versatile patterns and construction attributes that adapt to various preferences and requirements. The Torrent comprise a mushier and more sturdy ride with a porous upper; on the other hand, the Speedgoat contains a more rugged and safe fit with finer grip on all terrains.
Performance Comparison
Comfort and Fit
The Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat are engineered to offer trail athletes ease and support. However, they vary in their fit and padding. The Torrent contains a more profound profile and less padding, making it a superior choice for runners prioritizing a more innate feel and a closer-to-the-ground experience.
On the other hand, the Speedgoat comprise a more generous padding, which makes it perfect for runners who require additional support on longer runs.
Regarding fit, both shoes contain a spacious toe box with sufficient space for the toes to splay. However, the Speedgoat comprise a narrower fit in the midfoot, which aids in maintaining the foot locked in position and prevents slippage. The Torrent, on the other side, contains a more relaxed fit in the midfoot, which may not be adaptable for athletes who require a more safe fit.
Traction and Stability
Concerning traction and steadiness, the Torrent and Speedgoat perform perfectly on distinct terrain. The Torrent comprise a more aggressive lug design, which offers remarkable traction on muddy and loose terrain. However, it may function better on hard-packed surfaces.
The Speedgoat, on the other side, contains a less aggressive lug design, making it a finer choice for athletes who require a shoe that performs well on both trails and roads. Furthermore, the Speedgoat comprise a broader base, which gives better firmness on uneven terrain.
Durability
Both the Torrent and Speedgoat are structured to resist the rigors of trail running. However, the Speedgoat contains a more hard-wearing upper, constructed of a more rigid, more erosion-resistant material. The Torrent, on the other side, has a more porous upper, which may be less long-lasting in the long run.
Regarding the outsole, both shoes contain a durable rubber compound that gives remarkable grip and durability. However, the Torrent comprise a thinner outsole, which may deteriorate faster than the Speedgoat’s massive outsole.
| Hoka Torrent | Hoka Speedgoat | |
| Cushioning | Less | More |
| Fit | Relaxed | Tighter in midfoot |
| Traction | Aggressive lug pattern | Less aggressive lug pattern |
| Stability | Less stable | More stable |
| Upper | Breathable | More durable |
| Outsole | Thinner | Thicker |
The Torrent is a finer choice for runners who prioritize a more innate feel and require a shoe that performs flawlessly on muddy and loose terrain.
The Speedgoat, on the other hand, is a superior choice for athletes who need additional padding and aid on longer runs and desire a shoe that performs ideally on a diversity of surfaces.
Price Comparison
When it comes to selecting between the Hoka Torrent and the Speedgoat, the cost is an efficient consideration for many athletes. The Hoka Torrent is typically the more economical choice, with a retail fee of around $120; on the other hand, the Speedgoat generally sells for approximately $145. However, prices can differ based on the color and size of the shoe, as well as the retailer.
It’s worth mentioning that both the Torrent and the Speedgoat are contemplated exclusive trail running shoes, and their costs reflect this. However, many athletes find the additional price worth it for the finer comfort, aid, and longevity these shoes offer.
The Hoka Torrent may be the superior option for those on a narrower budget. It features many attributes similar to the Speedgoat, incorporating a feathery pattern, excellent grip, and Hoka’s signature padding, but at a more economical price point.
On the other hand, if you’re eager to invest more for extraordinary attributes and a more standard feel, the Speedgoat may be the way to go. It features a wider variety of color choices, a safer fit, and a moderately aggressive outsole that gives a finer grip on steep or technical terrain.
Eventually, the selection between the Hoka Torrent and the Speedgoat will be based on your particular requirements, preferences, and budget. Both shoes are remarkable for trail runners and feature an incredible amalgamation of comfort, aid, and performance.
Weight Comparison
Concerning trail running shoes, weight is an efficient point to consider. The Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat contain various weights, which can impact the athlete’s performance and experience.
The Hoka Torrent weighs approximately 8.7 ounces for men and 7.5 ounces for women, making it a delicate option for trail athletes. It contains unembellished and reactive padding, which can offer an efficient ground feel and legerity. The shoe comprises a 5mm drop and a stack height of 31mm/26mm. The multi-directional lugs are approximately 4mm in size, which can provide a good grip on different terrains.
Conversely, the Hoka Speedgoat is more massive than the Torrent. It weighs 10.3 ounces for men and 9.0 ounces for women. The shoe contains a maximal padding, offering an opulent and snug ride. It comprises a 4mm drop and a stack height of 32mm/27mm. The 5mm stepped lugs can provide good traction on steep and technical terrains.
The Hoka Torrent is a delicate option for trail athletes who prioritize unembellished and reactive padding. Meanwhile, the Hoka Speedgoat is a bit massive but features maximal padding for a snug ride. The selection between the two shoes eventually depends on the athlete’s preference and requirements.
| Shoe Model | Men’s Weight | Women’s Weight |
| Hoka Torrent | 8.7 oz | 7.5 oz |
| Hoka Speedgoat | 10.3 oz | 9.0 oz |
Key Takeaways:
- The Hoka Torrent is more delicate compared to the Hoka Speedgoat.
- The Hoka Torrent contains unembellished and reactive padding; on the contrary, the Hoka Speedgoat comprise maximal padding.
- The Hoka Torrent feature a 5mm drop and a stack height of 31mm/26mm; on the other hand, the Hoka Speedgoat contains a 4mm drop and a stack height of 32mm/27mm.
- The Hoka Torrent offers 4mm multi-directional lugs; on the other hand, the Hoka Speedgoat features 5mm stepped lugs.
Stack Height & Heel Drop
Regarding selecting between Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat, two of the most renowned trail running shoes, stack height and heel drop, are two efficient factors to contemplate.
The stack height is the quantity of padding between the foot and the ground. The Torrent contains a stack height of 23mm in the heel and 18mm in the forefoot; on the contrary, the Speedgoat comprise a stack height of 32mm in the heel and 27mm in the forefoot. This shows that the Speedgoat has a greater stack height and offers more padding than the Torrent.
The heel drop, on the other side, involves the difference in height between the heel and the forefoot. The Torrent contains a 5mm heel-to-toe drop; on the contrary, the Speedgoat has a 4mm heel-to-toe drop. This shows that the Speedgoat includes a more profound heel-to-toe drop and offers a more innate foot strike than the Torrent.
The given table sums up the stack height and heel drop of the Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat:
| Shoe Model | Stack Height | Heel-to-Toe Drop |
| Hoka Torrent | 23mm (heel), 18mm (forefoot) | 5mm |
| Hoka Speedgoat | 32mm (heel), 27mm (forefoot) | 4mm |
It is necessary to mention that while the Speedgoat offers more padding and contains a more profound heel-to-toe drop, the Torrent is considered more “responsive” and sits more deeply into the ground. This shows that the Torrent features a more connected feel to the trail; on the contrary, the Speedgoat performs finer on pavement and roads.
Eventually, the selection between the Hoka Torrent and Speedgoat depends on individual preference and the terrain you will be running on. If you prioritize a shoe with more padding and a more profound heel-to-toe drop, the Speedgoat may be the superior option. However, if you agree on a shoe that gives a more connected feel to the trail, the Torrent may be the finer choice.
Pros and Cons of Hoka Torrent
Concerning the Hoka Torrent, there are advantages and disadvantages to consider before breaking the bank. The following are several significant points to bear in mind:
Pros
- Lightweight: The Hoka Torrent is a comparatively light shoe, making it a good option for athletes who prefer speed and legerity over padding and aid.
- Versatile: The Torrent is structured to control a diversity of terrains, incorporating rocky trails and damp conditions. This makes it an iconic choice for athletes who mix up their routes.
- Good Traction: The Torrent comprises a grippy outsole that features remarkable traction on various surfaces. This can aid athletes in feeling more confident and safe on tricky terrain.
- Comfortable: Many athletes discover the Torrent as a snug shoe, thanks to its mushy padding and spacious toe box. This can aid in averting blisters and other foot injuries.
Cons
- Limited Cushioning: While the Torrent is structured to be a delicate shoe, it has less padding than some other Hoka designs. This can make it less snug for players who require more support.
- Narrow Fit: Some athletes discover that the Torrent has a tight fit, which can be intolerable for those with broader feet. Testing the shoe before buying is necessary to verify a good fit.
- Durability Issues: Several players have mentioned durability problems with the Torrent, just as the upper material deteriorates rapidly. This can be a problem for runners who desire a shoe that will endure them for miles.
Overall, the Hoka Torrent can be a perfect option for runners who prefer speed and iconicness over padding and support. However, it’s necessary to consider the shoe’s advantages and disadvantages before hitting the jackpot to verify that it fits your requirements perfectly.
Pros and Cons of Hoka Speedgoat
The Hoka Speedgoat is a famous trail running shoe with positive reviews from athletes and professionals alike. However, like any shoe, it contains its advantages and disadvantages. In this part, we will look deeper at the pros and cons of the Hoka Speedgoat.
Pros
- Excellent Traction: The Speedgoat’s Vibram Megagrip outsole features remarkable grip on various terrains, incorporating damp and skiddy surfaces.
- Comfortable Fit: The shoe’s broader toe box and opulent padding offer a snug fit, even on elongated runs.
- Durable: The Speedgoat’s rugged formation and hard-wearing materials make it a dependable shoe for trail running.
- Versatile: The shoe’s pattern permits it to perform well on diverse terrains, from stony trails to muddy paths.
Cons
- Heavy: The Speedgoat is not the industry’s most feathery trail running shoe, which may be a disadvantage for several athletes.
- Lack of Flexibility: The shoe’s firm construction may need to be more adaptable for players who prioritize a more stretchable shoe.
- Expensive: The Speedgoat is one of the industry’s more costly trail running shoes, which may be a switch-off for budget-conscious athletes.
The Hoka Speedgoat is a rigid option for trail athletes searching for a hard-wearing, snug shoe with outstanding traction. However, its weight and lack of stretchability may only be ideal for some players.
Hoka Torrent Or Speedgoat: Which Trail Running Shoe Is Best For Rocky Terrain?
Concerning trail running on rocky terrain, perfect shoes can make all the dissimilarity. Hoka One One features two famous choices for trail runners: the Torrent and the Speedgoat. But which one is best for rocky terrain?
The Torrent and the Speedgoat contain attributes perfect for stony terrain. However, several dissimilarities may create one more adaptable than the other based on the athlete’s preferences.
Hoka Torrent
The Hoka Torrent is a feathery trail running shoe with remarkable grip on various surfaces, incorporating rocky terrain. The shoe provides a hard-wearing outsole engineered with Vibram Megagrip rubber, ensuring finer grip and traction on damp and dry surfaces.
The Torrent also provides a PROFLY midsole, which balances padding and reactiveness, making it ideal for long and short runs on stony terrain. Furthermore, the shoe contains a shielding toe cap to help protect the toes from rocks and other problems on the trail.
Hoka Speedgoat
The Hoka Speedgoat is another renowned trail running shoe ideal for rocky terrain. The shoe provides a Vibram Megagrip outsole, which gives a remarkable grip on various surfaces, incorporating damp and dry rocks.
The Speedgoat also offers a whole-length EVA midsole, which gives padding and aid for long runs on rocky terrain. Furthermore, the shoe comprises a fortified toe cap to help shield the toes from rocks and other issues on the trail.
Which One Is Best?
The Torrent and the Speedgoat are outstanding choices for trail runners searching for shoes that can control rocky terrain.
The Torrent is a delicate shoe with a balance of padding and reactiveness, making it adaptable for long and short runs on stony terrain. The Speedgoat, on the other side, is a more padded shoe that gives remarkable aid and protection for long runs on rocky terrain.
In conclusion, the Torrent and the Speedgoat are perfect for trail runners searching for shoes that can control rocky terrain. The decision between the two eventually depends on the athlete’s preferences and requirements.
Final Verdict
Regarding selecting between the Hoka Torrent and the Hoka Speedgoat, it eventually depends on individual preference and the particular requirements of the runner. Both shoes feature versatile features and advantages.
The Hoka Torrent is a more feathery shoe with less padding, making it an ideal choice for runners who prefer speed and legerity. It comprises a deeper stack height and drop, making it more reactive and finer suited for technical terrain. The Torrent also include a broader toe box, offering more space for the toes to splay and minimizing the possibility of blisters.
Conversely, the Hoka Speedgoat features more padding and a greater stack height, making it a superior option for runners who agree on ease and support. It contains a more aggressive outsole with lower lugs, featuring a better grip on steep and loose terrain. The Speedgoat is also a safer fit with a tighter midfoot and heel.
For athletes who desire a balance of speed and ease, the Hoka Speedgoat may be the finer option. However, the Hoka Torrent may be the perfect option for those who agree on pace and legerity. Eventually, runners must test both shoes and detect which one feels ideal for their requirements and preferences.
Read more on:
