Hoka Kawana and Hoka Clifton are two of the most famous running shoes accessible in the industry today. Both shoes are structured to offer ease and aid to runners, but they contain several significant differences that separate them. In this article, we will contrast Hoka Kawana vs Clifton to help you determine which shoe is perfect for your running requirements.
Hoka Kawana is a comparatively new contribution to the Hoka lineup. It provides a broader, more sturdy footbed, making it a fantastic option for athletes with extensive feet or those who require additional steadiness during their runs. On the other side, Hoka Clifton is a moderate running shoe constructed to be utilized on the road and in the gym. It features a neutral quantity of aid and is a good option for most athletes.
This article will examine both shoes’ patterns, materials, and performance. We will also contrast their ease, fit, longevity, and price to aid you in making an informed decision. Whether you are a starter or an expert runner, this article will feature you with all the information you require to select between Hoka Kawana and Hoka Clifton.
Feature Table: Hoka Kawana Vs Hoka Clifton
| Feature | Hoka Kawana | Hoka Clifton |
| Overview | Versatile shoe for training and workouts | Moderate shoe for a snug and reactive ride |
| Weight | Heavier (10 oz for men, 8.9 oz for women) | Lighter (8.9 oz for men, 7.4 oz for women) |
| Cushioning | Abundant padding for a snug ride | Plush cushioning for comfort |
| Durability | More durable with reinforced upper | Durable with long-lasting outsole |
| Fit | Broader and sturdier footbed | Standard fit with cushioned tongue and collar |
| Price | Slightly more expensive | Slightly more affordable |
| Stack Height & Heel Drop | Moderate stack height and 5mm drop | Higher stack height and 5mm drop |
| Terrain Specialization | Versatile for various workouts | Ideal for road running and recovery runs |
Key Takeaways
- Hoka Kawana is a broader, more sturdy shoe; however, Hoka Clifton is a moderate running shoe with reasonable aid.
- Both shoes contain the same pattern aesthetics and are designed with top-quality materials.
- Hoka Kawana is massive and more costly than Hoka Clifton, but it gives finer longevity and support.
Overview of Hoka Kawana
The Hoka Kawana is an iconic running shoe constructed for regular training and different workout routines. It is placed between the Clifton and Bondi models in the Hoka lineup, balancing padding, steadiness, and reactiveness.
The Kawana provides a bevelled, swallow-tail heel pattern similar to the Clifton 8 and Clifton Edge shoes. This pattern offers a more comprehensive, flatter surface for even heel strikes and intensifies the shoe’s overall firmness.
The midsole of the Kawana is structured of Hoka’s signature EVA foam, which provides abundant padding and a snug ride. The shoe’s whole volume of foam in the midsole is 712 cm3 for men and 558 cm3 for women, making it more padded than the Clifton but less than the Bondi.
The Kawana comprise a moderate standard of firmness, having a 5mm drop/offset for both men and women. Its spring computation, which shows the curvature of the shoe, is also neutral, offering a balance of stretchability and support.
Overall, the Hoka Kawana is an outstanding option for athletes who want an iconic, padded shoe that can control different workout routines. Its versatile pattern features and stabilized performance make it a perfect addition to any athlete’s shoe collection.
Overview of Hoka Clifton
The Hoka Clifton has been a well-admired and famous running shoe in the market for many years. It is a moderate shoe that is structured for athletes who desire a snug and reactive ride. The following are several significant attributes of the Hoka Clifton:
- Weight: The Hoka Clifton is a delicate shoe, having a men’s size 9 weighing in at 8.9 oz and a women’s size 7 weighing in approximately 7.4 oz. This makes it a perfect option for athletes who desire a shoe that won’t weigh them down.
- Cushioning: The Clifton is famous for its abundant padding, which gives a snug ride. It contains a 5mm drop and a mild standard of stability.
- Durability: The Clifton is a hard-wearing shoe that is constructed to last. It offers a fortified upper and a long-lasting outsole that can handle diverse surfaces.
- Fit: The Clifton comprises a spacious toe box and a heel, which gives a cozy and safe fit. It is accessible in both men’s and women’s sizes.
Overall, the Hoka Clifton is ideal for athletes who desire a snug, reactive shoe that can control various surfaces. Its feathery design, luxury padding, and hard-wearing construction make it a famous choice among athletes of all levels.
Design and Aesthetics of Hoka Kawana
The Hoka Kawana is a running shoe with a streamlined and voguish pattern. It is available in various color shades, incorporating black, white, blue, and pink, permitting runners to select the one that perfectly matches their style.
The upper of the Kawana is designed with an absorbent netting material that aids in keeping the foot cool, fresh and dry during runs. The shoe also offers a cushioned tongue and collar, which give extraordinary ease and support.
One of the most noteworthy design attributes of the Kawana is its active foot frame. This versatile design offers moderate support, making it a perfect option for athletes with a neutral-oriented stride. The shoe also contains a broader, more sturdy footbed than the Hoka Clifton, making it an ideal choice for gym workouts and road running.
The midsole of the Kawana is constructed on a reactive, semi-firm chassis with voguish swallow-tail geometry. This pattern aids in encouraging a smooth and sturdy ride; on the contrary, it also gives a moderate quantity of padding. The shoe contains a 5mm drop, moderately deeper than Clifton’s 5mm drop.
Regarding aesthetics, the Kawana comprise a plain and understated appearance. It offers the Hoka logo on the edge and tongue of the shoe, as well as a small reflective band on the heel. The shoe’s clean pattern makes it an iconic choice that can be worn with diverse workout gear.
Overall, the Hoka Kawana contains a streamlined and modern pattern that is functional and modish. Its active foot frame and broader footbed make it a perfect option for athletes with a neutral-oriented stride; on the other hand, its semi-firm midsole gives a reactive and padded ride.
Design and Aesthetics of Hoka Clifton
The Hoka Clifton is a moderate running shoe with a slender and modern pattern. It offers a porous netting upper with unembellished overlays and a clean and slim look. The upper is accessible in various colors, incorporating black, white, blue, and pink, permitting runners to select the choice that perfectly fits their style.
One of the most noteworthy pattern elements of the Clifton is its midsole. It offers Hoka’s signature padding technology, constructed to provide an opulent and snug ride. The midsole is structured from EVA foam, which is both delicate and durable. It also contains a slight rocker appearance, which aids in encouraging a smooth and well-organized stride.
The outsole of the Clifton is structured from durable rubber, which offers remarkable grip and durability. It contains a whole-ground contact design, which aids in featuring a sturdy and safe ride. The outsole also gives a versatile pattern of grooves and lugs, which supports to intensify grip on diverse surfaces.
Overall, the pattern and aesthetics of the Hoka Clifton are both practical and voguish. It is a shoe that is structured to perform perfectly on the road; on the contrary, it also appears excellent on the feet of athletes.
Material Comparison
Insole Comparison
The Hoka Kawana and Clifton insoles are engineered with EVA foam, giving remarkable padding and impact absorption. However, the insole of the Kawana is moderately massive than that of the Clifton, featuring a more opulent feel.
Midsole Comparison
The Hoka Kawana and Clifton provide a midsole designed of compression-molded EVA foam. However, the Kawana’s midsole comprises a moderately greater stack height than the Clifton’s, giving more padding and a mushier ride.
The Kawana also include a broader platform, which provides finer steadiness.
Outsole Comparison
The outsoles of the Hoka Kawana and Clifton are engineered of hard-wearing rubber, featuring outstanding grip and longevity. However, the Kawana’s outsole comprises a slightly different design than the Clifton’s, with an extensive forefoot and more noticeable heel bevel. This pattern offers smoother transitions and finer ground contact.
Upper Comparison
The Hoka Kawana and Clifton uppers are designed with manufactured netting, giving remarkable permeability and a snug fit. However, the Kawana’s upper comprise a moderately different pattern than the Clifton’s, with a more organized heel counter and a broader toe box. This pattern features better aid and a more innate foot splay.
Overall, both the Hoka Kawana and Clifton are designed of top-quality materials that offer outstanding padding, durability, and aid. However, the Kawana’s moderately massive insole, greater stack height, broader platform, and more prominent heel bevel offer a more plentiful and sturdy ride; on the other hand, its more organized heel counter and more general toe box offer finer support and a more innate foot splay.
Performance Comparison
Regarding performance, both the Hoka Kawana and Clifton provide a snug and reactive ride. However, there are several significant differences to contemplate.
Firstly, the Kawana contains a moderately firmer midsole contrasted to the Clifton, which makes it a finer option for those searching for more aid and steadiness during their runs. Conversely, the Clifton features a squisher ride and is more adaptable for those who prioritize a padded feel.
In the matter of weight, the Clifton is more feathery than the Kawana, which can make it a superior choice for speed work or races. However, the Kawana’s additional weight derives from its extra padding, which can be advantageous for longer runs or those who require more aid.
Another noteworthy difference between the two shoes is the outsole pattern. The Kawana offers a more aggressive outsole design, which gives a finer grip on various surfaces. While still featuring good traction, the Clifton has a less hostile outsole and may not function as well on more technical terrain.
Comfort and Fit
Regarding selecting the perfect running shoe, comfort and fit are two of the most necessary factors to contemplate. In this part, we’ll examine how the Hoka Kawana and Clifton contrast regarding comfort and fit.
The Hoka Kawana offers a broader, more sturdy footbed, which gives a snug fit for diverse foot appearances. The shoe’s upper is designed with an absorbent netting material that aids in keeping your feet cool, fresh and dry during long runs. The shoe also contains a cushioned tongue and collar, which supports avert rubbing and irritation.
Conversely, the Hoka Clifton comprises a more customary fit with a tighter footbed. The shoe’s upper is designed of a feathery, porous mesh material that features a snug fit without sacrificing longevity. The shoe also has a cushioned tongue and collar for additional comfort.
Concerning sizing, both the Kawana and Clifton run true to size. However, several athletes have mentioned that the Clifton can feel a bit comfortable in the toe box, so it’s obligatory to test on both shoes to detect which one feels more snug for your foot shape.
The Hoka Kawana and Clifton offer a snug fit for diverse foot shapes. However, the Kawana’s broader footbed may be more snug for athletes with extensive feet; conversely, the Clifton’s more customary fit may be faster for players with tighter feet.
Durability and Quality
Regarding durability and quality, both the Hoka Kawana and Clifton are constructed to last. However, there are several dissimilarities to consider.
The Kawana is structured to be a more hard-wearing shoe than the Clifton. It offers a reinforced upper and a massive outsole, making it perfect for runners with a lot of deterioration on their boots. Furthermore, the Kawana comprise an extensive platform than the Clifton, which gives more steadiness and aid.
On the other side, the Clifton is still a very hard-wearing shoe. It contains a feathery netting upper that is absorbent and snug and offers a long-lasting outsole with excellent grip. However, it may be easier-wearing than the Kawana in the long run.
Regarding quality, both shoes are designed with top-quality materials and are structured with precision. Hoka is famous for its focus on detail; the Kawana and Clifton are no exception. The midsole of every shoe is constructed with Hoka’s signature EVA foam, which features remarkable padding and support.
Overall, the Hoka Kawana and Clifton are top-standard shoes constructed to last. The Kawana may be a finer option for runners who require a more durable shoe; conversely, the Clifton is still an outstanding choice for athletes who desire a feathery, snug shoe that can handle various distinct terrains.
Price Comparison
Concerning pricing, the Hoka Kawana and Clifton are both comparatively economical running shoes. The Kawana costs $140; on the other side, the Clifton is approximately $130. Both boots are accessible in men’s and women’s sizes.
However, it is necessary to mention that the Kawana is the latest model, launched in January 2022; on the contrary, the Clifton has been in the market for several years and has experienced multiple updates. As a result, it is feasible to use several versions of the Clifton at discounted costs.
Overall, the price dissimilarity between the two shoes could be more efficient, and athletes should consider other points such as fit, ease, and performance when detecting which shoe to buy.
Following is a rapid summary of the cost comparison between the Hoka Kawana and Clifton:
| Shoe | Price |
| Hoka Kawana | $140 |
| Hoka Clifton | $130 |
It is worth mentioning that pricing can differ based on the retailer, so athletes should shop around to discover the perfect deal. Furthermore, several retailers may feature discounts or promotions that can aid in minimizing the price of these shoes.
Weight Comparison
Regarding running shoes, weight is an obligatory factor to examine. The Hoka Kawana and Clifton models contain distinct weights, which can influence the athlete’s experience.
The Kawana is more massive than the Clifton, with the men’s version weighing 10 oz contrasted to the Clifton’s 8.9 oz. The additional weight derives from the Kawana’s extra padding, which features a more snug ride but may be better for athletes who prioritize a lighter shoe.
Conversely, Clifton’s feathery weight may make it a finer option for athletes who prefer speed and legerity. The shoe’s slender pattern permits a more innate feel and faster turnover, which can be advantageous for shorter-distance runs or speed workouts.
Those searching for a more padded ride may agree on the Kawana’s additional weight; however, those focused on speed and agility may go for the more delicate Clifton.
Stack Height & Heel Drop
Regarding contrasting the Hoka Kawana and Clifton, one of the significant dissimilarities is their stack height and heel drop. The stack height involves the quantity of padding in the shoe’s sole; on the other hand, the heel drop is the dissimilarity in size between the heel and toe of the shoe.
The Hoka Kawana contains a stack height of 30mm in the heel, 25mm in the forefoot for men, 27mm in the heel and 22mm in the forefoot for women. This provides the shoe with a moderate standard of padding, making it adaptable for regular training and longer runs. The heel drop is 5mm, which is comparatively low and gives a more innate feel when running.
In comparison, the Hoka Clifton comprises a greater stack height of 29mm in the heel, 24mm in the forefoot for men, 27mm in the heel and 22mm in the forefoot for women. This gives the shoe a mushier and more opulent feel, making it perfect for longer runs and recovery runs. The heel drop is approximately 5mm, similar to the Kawana.
Overall, the Kawana contains a moderately deeper stack height than the Clifton, making it an ideal choice for athletes prioritising a sturdier and more reactive ride. However, Clifton’s greater stack height features more padding and a squishier feel, making it a finer option for players who agree on ease over reactiveness.
Which one is good for running?: Hoka Kawana Or Clifton
The Hoka Clifton is an iconic neutral running shoe adaptable for most athletes. It offers a delicate pattern and a snug fit that permits a smooth and reactive ride. The shoe also comprises a broad footbed with steadiness and support, making it a perfect choice for long-distance running.
On the other side, the Hoka Kawana provides a more active foot frame that gives moderate aid to the foot. This makes it a perfect option for runners who require additional support during their runs. The shoe also contains a broader and more sturdy footbed that can support upgraded balance and minimize the possibility of injury.
Regarding durability, the Hoka Kawana is moderately more massive than the Clifton, but this additional weight is because of its increased durability. The shoe is structured to resist the deterioration of regular use, making it a perfect long-term investment for athletes. The Hoka Kawana and Clifton are remarkable running shoes with versatile attributes and advantages.
Which shoe is true to size?: Hoka Kawana Or Clifton
Concerning selecting running shoes, getting the perfect size is essential for ease and performance. In this part, we’ll detect whether the Hoka Kawana or Clifton is true to size.
According to our research we found that both Kawana and Clifton are constructed to fit true to size. However, several athletes may discover that they must adjust their size moderately based on their foot appearance and preferences.
The Kawana is generally famous for having a moderately broader fit with more volume, which can be advantageous for runners with extensive feet or those who prioritize a spacious toe box. Conversely, the Clifton is constructed with a more customary fit that may be better suited for players with tighter feet.
It’s worth mentioning that Hoka offers a number of their most famous shoes in broad size choices, so if you discover that your regular size could be better, you may desire to consider testing a moderately extensive version for a finer fit.
Eventually, the perfect way to detect which shoe is true to your size is to check it and see how it feels. It’s an ideal idea to test on both the Kawana and Clifton to contrast the fit and detect which one is most snug for your feet.
Conclusion
After contrasting the Hoka Kawana and Clifton running shoes, it is evident that both shoes have their advantages and disadvantages. The Kawana is a luxury runner, while the Clifton is a slight runner. The Kawana is slightly more heavier than the Clifton but is also more hard-wearing.
Regarding fit and comfort, the Kawana and Clifton are both structured to offer a snug ride. However, the Kawana comprise a broader toe box, which may be more snug for athletes with more expansive feet. Conversely, the Clifton has a more comfortable fit, which may be more cosy for athletes with tight feet.
Concerning steadiness and support, the Kawana and Clifton are constructed to offer a moderate support standard. However, the Kawana contains a moderately more significant drop/offset than the Clifton, which may be more adaptable for athletes who require more support. Conversely, the Clifton has a more reactive midsole, which may be perfect for players requiring more padding.
Regarding terrain and performance specialization, the Kawana and Clifton are both structured for road running. However, the Kawana may be ideal for athletes who require a shoe that can control diverse workouts; on the contrary, the Clifton may be more suitable for athletes who need a shoe that can hold longer distances.
Overall, it is challenging to state which shoe is the “real winner” between the Hoka Kawana and Clifton. Both boots have advantages and disadvantages, and the perfect shoe for a specific runner will be based on their requirements and preferences. It is suggested that runners test both boots and check them out on various surfaces and workouts to detect which shoe fits them.
Read more on:
